In Emily's recent response to my question about the practicality of Radical Constructivism she noted that everyone is limited to their own experience, and "
therefore there is no way for a human to be objective about anything." This seems problematic. This may be a cheap stunt to pull, but this appears to be an objective knowledge claim. A common theme I'm encountering with RCist argumentation: the need to prove Metaphysical Realism objectively false.
Question: Am i not being charitable enough? Or does Radical Constructivism employ truth to disprove it?
I believe Emily's claim is, or at least purports to be, an objective knowledge claim. Problematic ethical discourse has its version: "It's never right to judge"; or "It's always wrong to make moral judgments."
ReplyDelete